LGA DEMANDS CONTROL OVER COUNCIL TAX RULES

FIRST PUBLISHED BY: LOCAL GOVERNMENT CHRONICLES

THE GOVERNMENT MUST SCRAP BLANKET COUNCIL TAX DISCOUNTS OR THE POOREST WILL FACE HUGE BILLS.

That warning has come from the Local Government Association, which said more than two million people who are either low earners or young and unemployed could have to pay an average of £247more in Council Tax each year. Control of entitlement to the benefit is due to pass to councils next year. But the government will impose a £500m cut, equivalent to 10% of the total available.

And it has ordered that discounts cannot be reduced for single people regardless of income or for currently eligible pensioners, as well as suggesting that vulnerable groups such as families with children should be protected from any reductions. Ministers have claimed that councils could make up the shortfall by cutting discounts for second homes and empty properties.

But LGA chair Sir Merrick Cockell (Con) rejected this: “The poorest regions and the most vulnerable people will be hardest hit by this cut unless the government offers councils more flexibility over all forms of Council Tax discount. “It is the only way that councils can ensure that the greatly reduced funding for Council Tax benefit is targeted at the local people who need it most.” Without this, the £500m cut would prove “impossible to deliver” except through service cuts, higher overall tax rates or the higher charge for working poor people and the young unemployed, he warned. Sir Merrick added: “The Treasury has made the cut and left councils to make incredibly tough decisions and face the inevitable fallout.”

The LGA arrived at its £247 figure by taking Department for Work and Pensions statistics, published only at UK level, which show 5.9 million Council Tax benefit recipients, of whom 2.2 million are aged 65 or over and 1.7 million are families with children. The first group must be protected, and it has assumed that councils would wish to protect the second, leaving 2.0 million working age benefit recipients to share the £500m cut, an average of £247 each. For England, the figure would be roughly £210. David Magor, chief executive of the Institute of Revenues, Rating and Valuation, said: “The shortfall in England will be £437m, and the government has said second and empty home discounts could be worth some £420m. “The trouble with that is that it is ‘lumpy’ at local level. If you have not got many second homes you will have to cover the gap from something else.”

Councils in places such as the south west, with both low income levels and high numbers of holiday homes, might make the equation work, but those in older industrial areas could struggle, he said. Local government minister Bob Neill said: “The government has no intention of letting councils abolish vital discounts like those for single person homes.

“Spending on Council Tax benefit has more than doubled since 1997. The Local Government Association needs to realise that councils accounts for a quarter of all public expenditure and they need to play their part in tackling the deficit.” He added: “We are giving councils a strong incentive to put in place a better and fairer local Council Tax support scheme based on local priorities that means they can help more residents get back into employment, protect the vulnerable and reduce the spiralling benefits bill.”

The Local Government Finance Bill, which would give effect to the changes in Council Tax benefit, is due for debate in the House of Lords this evening.

READ WHAT: ERIC PICKLES ‘SECRETARY OF STATE’ SAYS ABOUT OVER-CHARGED COUNCIL TAX.

ARE YOU PAYING TOO MUCH COUNCIL TAX - CHECK HERE?

£2BILLION OF COUNCIL TAX LEFT UNCOLLECTED BY TOWN HALLS WHO THEN MOAN ABOUT CUTS BY WHITEHALL

FIRST PUBLISHED BY: THE MAIL ONLINE

COUNCILS IN ENGLAND HAVE FAILED TO COLLECT BILLIONS IN COUNCIL TAX – WHILE COMPLAINING ABOUT CUTS TO THEIR BUDGETS FROM WHITEHALL.

The total arrears – much dating back several years – is spread across 31 local authorities and stands at £2.3billion. Eight out of the ten councils with the worst record on collecting Council Tax are Labour-run. Liverpool had the highest amount of arrears, with nearly£108million in Council Tax outstanding – about £500 per household in the city.

Biggest debts: Liverpool City Council is owed £108million in unpaid Council Tax. Earlier this year, the city’s Labour leader Joe Anderson said he was ‘so angry and so devastated’ that the council had to find £91million in savings. 

That amount is less than the total in uncollected Council Tax. 'Angry': Liverpool's Mayor Joe Anderson was 'devastated' the council had to make savings in other areas to make up the shortfall. Manchester’s plans to cut services were criticised last year by David Cameron when he told the Labour-run local authority it should first cut its chief executive’s £200,000 salary. Labour regained control of Birmingham from the Tories and Lib-Dems in May and Croydon, also among the ten with the worst record, is controlled by the Tories. Local government minister Bob Neill unveiled the figures in a parliamentary answer to Labour MP Helen Jones. He said: ‘Every penny of Council Tax that is not collected means a higher Council Tax for the law-abiding citizen who does pay on time. 

‘These figures show that there is a significant source of income which councils could use to support frontline service or cut Council Tax bills.’ Lambeth, which has £48million of uncollected Council Tax, last year used taxpayers’ money to fund a poster campaign complaining about central government spending cuts. The posters said: ‘The Government has cut our money so we are forced to cut services.’ The Government has ordered a freeze of Council Tax across the country and has refused to pour in more cash to profligate councils.

'Shameful': Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Eric Pickles accused local authorities of squandering millions by failing to collect Council Tax Local authorities have also expressed outrage over the Government’s 28 per cent cut to their funding. But Local Government and Communities Secretary Eric Pickles yesterday hit back, saying: ‘This roll call of shame is familiar reading, with Labour councils year in year out topping the table of local authorities who squander millions by failing to collect our Council Tax.

‘If these Labour authorities stopped complaining about the legacy of cuts left by their own party and actually chased upCouncil Tax dodgers they could use the money to protect hundreds of frontline jobs.’ The worst collection rate in England for last year was the London borough of Newham, where 8.3 per cent of Council Tax was not paid. It was followed by Manchester, Salford and the London boroughs of Southwark, and Barking and Dagenham. In total, £612million of Council Tax was not collected in 2010-11 across England.

READ WHAT: ERIC PICKLES ‘SECRETARY OF STATE’ SAYS ABOUT OVER-CHARGED COUNCIL TAX.

ARE YOU PAYING TOO MUCH COUNCIL TAX - CHECK HERE?

TREASURY LOOKS AT 'SUPER COUNCIL TAX' TO FORCE MULTI-MILLIONAIRES PAY MORE FOR THEIR PROPERTIES

FIRST PUBLISHED BY: THIS IS MONEY  

THE CHANCELLOR COULD IMPOSE SUPER COUNCIL TAX BANDS ABOVE BAND H TO FORCE THE WEALTHIEST TO PAY MORE FOR THEIR PROPERTIES.

The Chancellor could impose super Council Tax bands

The Chancellor is considering slapping taxes on expensive houses in a deal with Lib Dems that would also relax employment laws for small business. George Osborne is examining proposals to impose super Council Tax bands above the current band H in order to force the wealthiest to pay more for their properties. The plans, which are being discussed by the Quad of ministers drawing up the Budget, would be a victory for the Liberal Democrats, who have campaigned for a mansion tax on properties worth more than £2million.

But in return, Nick Clegg and his party have indicated they are prepared to sanction Tory plans to tear up some employment rights in order to encourage firms to hire staff. Senior Lib Dem sources say the Deputy Prime Minister will back proposals in the Beecroft Report on regulation which would give greater freedoms to micro-firms employing fewer than ten people. Under the plans, small companies employing people under the age of 25 would not have to give them full employment rights for a fixed period of time.

Tories, including Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles, have opposed any change in Council Tax bands because they feared it would lead to an expensive and controversial revaluation of all homes in Britain. But some Conservatives now believe that would not be necessary and that bands I and J – designed to hit multi-millionaires in London – could be imposed on homes based on the last valuation in April 1991.

Mr Clegg argued last month that it is wrong that someone with a house in Band H – which kicks in at properties worth £320,000 in 1991 – pays the same as someone with a home worth several million pounds. A Government source said: ‘Treasury orthodoxy favours taxing assets that cannot be hidden or moved. Even the best accountant in the world cannot hide a house from the tax man.’

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has argued that new tax bands I and J would hit multi-millionaires in London. The Beecroft Report, drawn up by venture capitalist Adrian Beecroft last autumn, has never been published after the Lib Dems condemned its call for ‘fire at will’ legislation that would have allowed bosses to sack staff without an industrial tribunal. Mr Clegg’s party is prepared to help get its way on property taxes after Mr Osborne came under pressure from backbenchers to back supply side reforms to boost business and jobs.

Former Cabinet minister Liam Fox yesterday stepped up that campaign, saying: ‘Political objections must be put aside. ‘It is too difficult to hire and fire and too expensive to take on new employees.’ Asked if the Lib Dems would support plans to suspend some workplace rights for under 25s – to encourage the hiring young unemployed people – a source said: ‘The devil is in the detail but it’s not something where the starting point of view is hostile.’

Lib Dems point out Business Secretary Vince Cable has doubled to two years the length of time someone must work before they are entitled to basic rights. A Treasury spokesman said the issue of mansion tax ‘comes up every year and it is speculation’.

READ WHAT: ERIC PICKLES ‘SECRETARY OF STATE’ SAYS ABOUT OVER-CHARGED COUNCIL TAX.

ARE YOU PAYING TOO MUCH COUNCIL TAX - CHECK HERE?

GOVERNMENT RULES OUT ENGLISH COUNCIL TAX REVALUATION

FIRST PUBLISHED BY: BBC

COUNCIL TAX BANDS IN ENGLAND HAVE NOT BEEN REVALUED FOR 17 YEARS

There will be no revaluation of Council Tax bands in England during this Parliament, the government has pledged. It means there will be no rise in local taxes for householders based solely on the increased value of their homes. Every property in England is in one of eightCouncil Tax bands, depending on value, and these were last set in 1993. The government said Labour had been "actively planning" to carry out a revaluation but Labour said its election manifesto had promised not to.

'Financial worries'

A revaluation was long overdue, but would prove highly unpopular with householders who found themselves in a higher band and therefore paying more in Council Tax, said the BBC's Greg Wood. A revaluation in Wales in 2005 placed about a third of all homes there in a higher band. The government says that a rise from Band D - the benchmark for Council Tax - to Band E would cost an extra £320-a-year. The former Labour government had planned to revalue Council Tax bands in England in 2007, but announced in 2005 that it would postpone the decision until after the next general election.

It said the delay was to allow the issue to be considered as part of a wider inquiry into local authority funding, but some commentators said at the time that the decision was also a reaction to the anger sparked by the Welsh revaluation. Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles said the key thing was the relationship between the upper and lower bands of the tax, and they were roughly the same as when the tax was introduced.

"I've always argued against a revaluation because we know from what happened in Wales that it tends to hit poorer families. Given that the bands are roughly in the same position as when Council Tax was first introduced then it seems to me to be a matter of fairness that we don't impose an additional level of taxation, £1,600 during this Parliament, on ordinary families."

But a Labour spokesman said: "The Labour Party made an unequivocal commitment that there would be no Council Taxrevaluation in this Parliament.  "This is a cynical and misleading manipulation of facts based on what was ultimately a routine updating of the Valuation Office Agency's records." The Taxpayers' Alliance, which campaigns for lower taxes, said families would be relieved there was to be no revaluation. "Council Tax has doubled in the last 10 years while many services have been scaled back, executive pay has spiralled out of control and charges have increased; it's time Council Tax was cut," spokesman Emma Boon said.

"What's been happening is that where local councils have looked at trying to find other ways of charging people, it's just simply meant other taxes... charging people for throwing away more rubbish or fining people and things like that." Colin Barrow, leader of Westminster City Council, said councils would welcome the move as a "positive step" that would "end uncertainty" for many Council Tax payers and local authorities.

"It allows the government to concentrate on creating a fairer and more responsive financial system, reflecting the differing needs of each area.  "We, for instance, would refer to the special problems of poverty in Westminster alongside the responsibility we have to keep the city clean for millions of visitors every day," he said. What band a house falls into is determined by inspectors from the government's Valuation Office Agency (VOA). There has been criticism in the past from some quarters over what data about people's homes is collected and kept by the VOA.

Mr Pickles said the government was moving to address this issue, and that an independent data audit of the VOA would protect privacy and civil liberties as part of dismantling the "database state". The Scottish Parliament has no plans to revalue homes in the foreseeable future. In Northern Ireland, which has a different system of local taxes, property values were reassessed in 2005.

READ WHAT: ERIC PICKLES ‘SECRETARY OF STATE’ SAYS ABOUT OVER-CHARGED COUNCIL TAX.

ARE YOU PAYING TOO MUCH COUNCIL TAX - CHECK HERE?

WAS IT COINCIDENCE THAT I GOT A MESSAGE FROM A FIRM I OWE MONEY SOON AFTER I MISSED MY COUNCIL TAX PAYMENT?

FIRST PUBLISHED BY:   THIS IS MONEY

TIMELY TEXT: WAS IT A COINCIDENCE THAT I GOT A TEXT MESSAGE FROM A CREDITOR URGING ME TO GET IN TOUCH A WEEK AFTER I MISSED A COUNCIL PAYMENT?

I had a text on my mobile phone out of the blue from a creditor urging me to get in touch if I was experiencing financially difficulties just a week after missing a Council Tax payment. Do banks/mortgage lenders or even the councils send out advisories as to who might be struggling financially? If so isn’t this a breach of confidentially? It doesn’t feel like a coincidence as I have never missed a payment and the creditor has a secured loan i.e a second charge on my property.  

Linda Mckay of This is Money replies: Struggling borrowers such as yourself who are juggling many different debts including a mortgage, second charge or credit cards may have trouble in meeting all the demands of creditors. Can creditors spot financial difficulty and if so how? I asked experts in the field for you. Joanna Elson OBE, chief executive of the Money Advice Trust replies: The crucial issue here is whether or not this is a creditor through which you pay yourCouncil Tax. If they are not, then something may be amiss and a breach of confidentiality under the Data Protection Act is worth exploring. 

In this case the first thing to do is to write to the creditor and ask what information they used to identify your supposed financial difficulty. A missed Council Tax payment may show on your credit file, and so a creditor could possibly spot this while carrying out a genuine check on your file. However, if this is the case you should ask the creditor to justify why they were looking at your file, as creditors can’t simply do so on a whim. Alternatively it may have been a phishing text with coincidental timing.

However, if this is a creditor through which you pay your Council Tax, then there has been no breach. Indeed we encourage creditors to proactively contact customers they identify as being at risk of financial difficulty.  Of course much of our support for such practices depends on the nature of how the creditor contacts such an individual and what advice they provide. 

For example if a creditor notices an individual frequently incurring charges for dipping into an unauthorised overdraft and they then contact that person to signpost them to relevant sources of free debt advice, such as National Debtline, My Money Steps or Citizens Advice, the person may be able to resolve their financial situation more quickly and less painfully than might have been the case had the creditor simply ignored the issue and continued collecting overdraft fees and charges.

We conducted research into the merits of proactive contact with struggling borrowers last year, and found that the results of these practices were overwhelmingly positive, with people resolving their financial problems before they became particularly serious. Anyone who is struggling with their finances is likely to find a far better outcome the earlier they start to deal with their problem, and the first step is to seek free, independent advice.

James Jones, of leading credit agency Experian replies: Councils do not share data about Council Tax payments with lenders through the credit reference agencies (CRAs), so the text from your mobile phone provider will not be because you missed a Council Tax payment. Many lenders that do share credit data through the CRAs do get your permission to consult it on a regular basis. If, while doing this, they spot a missed payment elsewhere or simply that your overall financial situation is deteriorating, they may take action such as getting in touch to offer help.

If you’re concerned about the information on your credit report, it’s easy to get hold of a copy. If you do this and find a mistake you can make sure it is corrected. You can also use a ‘notice of correction’ to explain the reasons for any correct missed payments or other adverse information in the past.

READ WHAT: ERIC PICKLES ‘SECRETARY OF STATE’ SAYS ABOUT OVER-CHARGED COUNCIL TAX.

ARE YOU PAYING TOO MUCH COUNCIL TAX - CHECK HERE?