FIRST PUBLISHED BY: THE GUARDIAN
ONE BY ONE THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT LABOUR COULD HAVE SEIZED TO ENSURE HISTORIC SOCIAL REFORMS ARE BEING DROPPED.
First, just before the last election,
Tomlinson's comprehensive reform of 14 to 19 education was wrongly
dropped. Just after the election, the government made it clear pension
reform would have to wait for a fourth term. Yesterday, a long-delayed Council Tax revaluation, on which
work had belatedly just begun, was called off and will not come back before a
fourth term.
What was already a regressive tax, which Labour pledged to reform in 1998, now
looks set to be still in operation in 2010.
Each year of delay will make it more
regressive. The eight bands into which the country's 22 million homes are
currently divided are headed by a top-rate band valued at £320,000 or over. But
in a country with ever-growing numbers of £1m homes, this has merely provided
the wealthy with an unacceptable escape hole.
Although the top band pays three times as much as the bottom, researchers have
shown that the 10% of poorest Council Tax payers are spending proportionately four times as much of their
income in Council Tax as
the richest 10%. So much for the state of Labour's commitment to social
justice.
What caused the postponement? Ministers
claimed it was the new wider remit they had given to Michael Lyons' inquiry
into local government funding. This was a threadbare excuse, which will fool no
one. Whatever Sir Michael finally concludes, some form of domestic property tax
will be included in the package. There is hardly a developed state that does
not have one.
A government that has rightly noted the role that assets play in widening
inequalities, could not contemplate dropping such a tax. Sir Michael was ready
to have a one-year delay, but not five. The last valuation was carried out in
1991. As Sir Michael noted, the credibility of the tax depends on regular
revaluations.
The real cause of the postponement was fear
of a voter backlash. In Wales, where revaluation has taken place, 60% remained
in the same tax bracket but a third ascended into a higher one. In London and
the south-east this proportion would have been even higher. Ironically,
postponement will make the inevitable change more difficult.
What should have happened, which Labour committed itself to doing in 1998, was
a revaluation of all homes plus a restructuring of the eight bands. Ideally,
there should be two further ones at the top, and one more at the bottom to help
the less well-off.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I support Council Tax Rebates in assisting home owners and tenants in getting a rebate on their over-paid Council Tax.