First Published BY: The Guardian
There is a solution to Council Tax hikes: put up the business rate, says Peter Hetherington
Councils in England should
have entered 2012 with a renewed sense of optimism.
Frequently sidelined,
ignored and attacked by ministers for inflation-busting Council Tax increases they were lauded
by the Audit Commission last year for a "marked improvement" in
performance over the past 12 months
The second comprehensive
performance assessment (CPA)
showed that almost two thirds of the biggest authorities were generally in a
good state of health - a year after the commission showered praise on the best
councils and noted that, when gauging efficiency and value for money, they
stood comparison with the best private businesses.
At any other time, the
government - which, after all, instituted the complex and expensive CPA
process - might be joining James Strachan, the commission chairman, in
proclaiming the "excellent news". Instead, the praise was grudging.
Local and regional government
minister Nick Raynsford, are in a belligerent mood and preparing to - let's be
blunt - wield the axe on authorities daring to post Council Tax increases above
"low" single figures. Raynsford says it's a near certainty that some
budgets will be capped.
In local government, 12 months
seems an eternity. Last year, ministers were promising councils extra freedoms
and flexibilities in return for decent CPA ratings. Some at the margins have
been delivered, a few strings to Whitehall severed, while an innovation forum,
embracing ministers and councillors, has been mulling over what further powers
might be devolved from the centre to the council chamber.
But everybody knows
there is one sticking point in a key area which dare not speak its name:
finance.
The method of funding local
government is in a mess, bordering on chaos. Ministers have known about this
since Labour came to power (and lost the last election) - which is why, last
year, Nick Raynsford changed the formula governing the system that allocates
government grants and the uniform business rate (together accounting for three
quarters of council spending) to councils.
In political terms, this has
only made matters worse for the government; a slight shift in resources from
the south to parts of the Midlands and the north produced an almighty outcry
and, according to another Audit Commission report last month, ministers were at
least partly responsible for Council Tax
rises this financial year.
The revised formula sent out
all the wrong signals to marginal middle-England, the places where elections
are won and lost. These days it has moved south from the West Mid lands, and
parts of the north, to Hertfordshire and Kent - the very areas hammered by the
marginal shift in resources.
Downing Street was not amused
- especially after leaked reports from a Cabinet sub-committee last year showed
Prescott insisting, under pressure from No 10, that nothing be done to penalise
this important constituency by giving the impression that the north was getting
more at the expense of the south.
Over the past few weeks the
government has responded with almost £800m extra for town and county halls -
barely a month after agreeing the annual Whitehall grant settlement - to keep
average increases in the next financial year close to the low single figures.
It will be a hard task.
The deputy prime minister
knows that the current system, broadly in place since the poll tax was scrapped,
is unsustainable. He told the Guardian as much last month. Then he acknowledged
that a review currently under way and chaired by Raynsford (with the help of up
to 20 experts from local government, finance, academia, unions, and business)
will have to be "deeper than the relationship between central and local
government."
Revealingly, he added: "I
do not think the Council Tax will
live up to that kind of review. I am trying to manage a difficulty that has
been brought about not just since some pensioners have been kicking up [about Council Tax rises this year]. The whole
way local authorities are financed is not good enough."
Councils need additional
sources of funds and more revenue-raising powers. The problem is that the most
sensible reform, namely addressing "underfunding" from business rates
will be ruled out of order by Downing Street and probably by the Treasury
because the business lobby will not wear any change.
Yet a recent report by Maureen
Wellen, assistant director of local government finance and policy at Cipfa, the professional body for council
finance officers, shows that in just over 10 years the contribution made by ordinary Council Taxpayers has increased
by a third, while the share paid by business has fallen significantly.
This is because governments
have pegged any increases in business rates to inflation - at a time, says
Wellen, when the needs of local government have risen faster than inflation (pay
rises, for instance, outstrip inflation).
There is one obvious
conclusion from her analysis. Businesses are getting cut-price property taxes,
while householders pick up the tab.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I support Council Tax Rebates in assisting home owners and tenants in getting a rebate on their over-paid Council Tax.